Difference between revisions of "Permaculture"
(→Name and origins) |
|||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Permaculture''' | + | '''Permaculture''' began as a set of [[farming principles]] and a design system that was developed in Australia by Bill Mollison and David Holmgren starting in 1978. It since has grown to become something of a philosophical system encompassing elements of social and environmental theory and, in some parts of the permaculture community, an almost spiritual worldview. |
| + | |||
| + | Permaculture is difficult to define because it means many different things to different people. It has become a vehicle for all sorts of movements and ideas because it is a [[holistic]] system of observation and design which focuses on the interactions between elements and attempts to bring them into harmony and create synergy between them. This appeals to a subset of people within the developed world who recognize the growing failures of a [[reductionism|reductive]] worldview that seeks to separate, specialize and optimize each function yet tends to ignore the interactions between parts and fails to optimize the system as a whole. The community dedicated to permaculture has become involved in diverse topics such as town planning, alternative forms of trade and capital, architecture, building design and construction, landscaping and ecology. | ||
==Name and origins== | ==Name and origins== | ||
| − | Bill Mollison and David Holmgren claimed to have coined the term "Permaculture" as a portmanteau of "Permanent | + | Bill Mollison and David Holmgren claimed to have coined the term "Permaculture" as a portmanteau of "[[Permanent agriculture]]" - and Mollison has attempted to control use of the word by claiming copyrights over the word. Nevertheless the two men clearly piggybacked on an older set of ideas and discussions around "[[permanent agriculture]]". |
| − | + | Permanent Agriculture [[Permanent Agriculture|(Main article:Permanent Agriculture)]] was an earlier sustainable agriculture movement that began around 1910 and gained momentum through the 1940's despite being repressed by the USDA[http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CC4QFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scirp.org%2Fjournal%2FPaperDownload.aspx%3FpaperID%3D6685&ei=NMa1VLHgPIqmyASG6YFQ&usg=AFQjCNHuFXfVXNz3pCf_iD7rp0WtJbRJKg&bvm=bv.83640239,d.aWw] | |
| − | + | Homgren and Mollison owe much to men such as Yeomans, Cyril, King, and others involved in the [[permanent agriculture]] movement | |
| − | and | + | ==Limitations and Critique== |
| − | + | Permaculture has become quite popular among a subset of western society, many people willing to pay large sums to attend a [[Permaculture Design Course]] (PDC). Some have criticized the movement of being cult-like; attracting only "young dreamy idealists" but not actually having won over mainstream food producers. Very few farmers involved in commercial food production (that is, those who make a living from food production economically, as well as calorically by producing an abundance of food to market to others) consider themselves pure permaculture practitioners or have won the unanimous approval of the permaculture community. This had led to criticisms that permaculture is too radical, guided only by idealistic theory and not practical enough to survive in the real world. | |
| − | + | ===Twelve design principles=== | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | ===Twelve | + | |
Twelve Permaculture design principles articulated by David Holmgren in his [http://holmgren.com.au/product/principles/ ''Permaculture: Principles and Pathways Beyond Sustainability''] | Twelve Permaculture design principles articulated by David Holmgren in his [http://holmgren.com.au/product/principles/ ''Permaculture: Principles and Pathways Beyond Sustainability''] | ||
| Line 35: | Line 33: | ||
# ''Creatively use and respond to change'': We can have a positive impact on inevitable change by carefully observing, and then intervening at the right time. | # ''Creatively use and respond to change'': We can have a positive impact on inevitable change by carefully observing, and then intervening at the right time. | ||
| − | |||
| − | == | + | ==Main ideas== |
| + | |||
| + | ===Zones=== | ||
| + | ===Layers=== | ||
| + | ===Guilds=== | ||
| + | ===Edges=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Common techniques== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | === Agroforestry === | ||
| + | {{see|main article|agroforestry}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Hügelkultur === | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Sheet mulching === | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Keyline design === | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Rainwater harvesting === | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Natural building === | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Intensive rotational grazing === | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Fruit tree management === | ||
Latest revision as of 07:37, 28 February 2015
Permaculture began as a set of farming principles and a design system that was developed in Australia by Bill Mollison and David Holmgren starting in 1978. It since has grown to become something of a philosophical system encompassing elements of social and environmental theory and, in some parts of the permaculture community, an almost spiritual worldview.
Permaculture is difficult to define because it means many different things to different people. It has become a vehicle for all sorts of movements and ideas because it is a holistic system of observation and design which focuses on the interactions between elements and attempts to bring them into harmony and create synergy between them. This appeals to a subset of people within the developed world who recognize the growing failures of a reductive worldview that seeks to separate, specialize and optimize each function yet tends to ignore the interactions between parts and fails to optimize the system as a whole. The community dedicated to permaculture has become involved in diverse topics such as town planning, alternative forms of trade and capital, architecture, building design and construction, landscaping and ecology.
Name and origins
Bill Mollison and David Holmgren claimed to have coined the term "Permaculture" as a portmanteau of "Permanent agriculture" - and Mollison has attempted to control use of the word by claiming copyrights over the word. Nevertheless the two men clearly piggybacked on an older set of ideas and discussions around "permanent agriculture".
Permanent Agriculture (Main article:Permanent Agriculture) was an earlier sustainable agriculture movement that began around 1910 and gained momentum through the 1940's despite being repressed by the USDA[1]
Homgren and Mollison owe much to men such as Yeomans, Cyril, King, and others involved in the permanent agriculture movement
Limitations and Critique
Permaculture has become quite popular among a subset of western society, many people willing to pay large sums to attend a Permaculture Design Course (PDC). Some have criticized the movement of being cult-like; attracting only "young dreamy idealists" but not actually having won over mainstream food producers. Very few farmers involved in commercial food production (that is, those who make a living from food production economically, as well as calorically by producing an abundance of food to market to others) consider themselves pure permaculture practitioners or have won the unanimous approval of the permaculture community. This had led to criticisms that permaculture is too radical, guided only by idealistic theory and not practical enough to survive in the real world.
Twelve design principles
Twelve Permaculture design principles articulated by David Holmgren in his Permaculture: Principles and Pathways Beyond Sustainability
- Observe and interact: By taking time to engage with nature we can design solutions that suit our particular situation.
- Catch and store energy: By developing systems that collect resources at peak abundance, we can use them in times of need.
- Obtain a yield: Ensure that the system is productive.
- Apply self-regulation and accept feedback: We need to discourage inappropriate activity to ensure that systems can continue to function well.
- Use and value renewable resources and services: Make the best use of nature's abundance to reduce our consumptive behavior and dependence on non-renewable resources.
- Produce no waste: By valuing and making use of all the resources that are available to us, nothing goes to waste.
- Design from patterns to details: By stepping back, we can observe patterns in nature and society. These can form the backbone of our designs, with the details filled in as we go.
- Integrate rather than segregate: By putting the right things in the right place, relationships develop between those things and they work together to support each other.
- Use small and slow solutions: Small and slow systems are easier to maintain than big ones, making better use of local resources and producing more sustainable outcomes.
- Use and value diversity: Diversity reduces vulnerability to a variety of threats and takes advantage of the unique nature of the environment in which it resides.
- Use edges and value the marginal: The interface between things is where the most interesting events take place. These are often the most valuable, diverse and productive elements in the system.
- Creatively use and respond to change: We can have a positive impact on inevitable change by carefully observing, and then intervening at the right time.
